The United States Court supports the law that requires bytedance to sell Tiktok or face the prohibition

A Federal Court of the United States has supported the legislation that requires the bytedance of the Chinese technology giant to sell its ownership of the popular social media platform Tiktok in the United States at the beginning of next year or to face a ban at national level. Power marks a significant victory for the Department of Justice and the critics of Tiktok, who have long expressed concern for the bonds of the app at China. However, the decision deals with a serious set of bytedance setting as it now faces the possibility of losing access to the 170 million US users of the app.

The sentence increases the probability of an unprecedented ban on a social network app widely used in the United States. Bytedance and Tiktok should challenge the decision, potentially intensifying the case to the United States Supreme Court or requesting a test from the complete court of appeal.

The Court emphasizes concerns for national security

The Court of Appeal, made up of the Sri Srinivasan judges, mist of Rao and Douglas Ginsburg, concluded that the law that required the reclamation to sell Tiktok was a deliberate and bipartisan effort by the congress and subsequent administrations regarding the safety risks national post by foreign opponents.

The Court observed that the legislation was designed to safeguard US interests against that which considered a “well -financed national security threat represented by the People's Republic of China (RPC)”. The sentence reflects the concerns that the ownership of Tiktok by a Chinese company could allow the collection of data or influence campaigns that compromise the security of the United States.

According to the terms of the law, Bytedance must sell or give up the US operations of Tiktok by January 19, 2025. If he cannot conform, the app will face a ban.

Tiktok's uncertain future

Tiktok's future in the United States now depends on a series of critical decisions. The Biden administration, which has until January 19 to enforce the divestment, could choose to grant an extension of 90 days, further pushing the deadline in 2025. However, the final decision could rest with the president elected Donald Trump, which It is intended to light on January 20.

Trump, who had previously tried to ban Tiktok during his first term in 2020, remained vocal on his skepticism for the app and his potential risks. Before the November elections, he reaffirmed his position, stating that he would not hesitate to act against Tiktok if necessary.

The Department of Justice and Tiktok has not yet issued statements on the sentence.

The next bytedance steps

It is likely that bytedance pursues further legal roads in an attempt to overturn the decision. The appeals to the Supreme Court or requests for proof by the complete Court of Appeal remain possible strategies to delay or prevent the application of the law.

For bytedance, the stakes are high. Tiktok's American market is a key component of its global activity, with about 170 million active users in the country. Losing access to this public could have a significant impact on the company's financial benefits and its position in the competitive panorama on social media.

Tiktok, for his part, has constantly denied the accusations of representing a threat to national security, insisting on the fact that users' data is stored safely and not shared with the Chinese government. Despite these insurance, bipartisan concerns for the owners and operations of the app have persisted.

Wider implications for technology and geopolitics

The Court's decision is part of a wider effort to deal with the risks received for national security related to Chinese technological societies. The sentence aligns with the legislative and executive actions in progress aimed at limiting China's influence in critical industries, from telecommunications to artificial intelligence.

The Tiktok case also highlights the growing intersection between technology and geopolitics. While the tensions between the United States and China continue to intensify, actions such as the divestment requirement for Tiktok underline the challenges of the navigation of global markets in an era of an increase in data security control and foreign flu.

For users, the decision raises questions about the future availability of Tiktok in the United States while the app remains operational for now, the impending expiry of January 19 and the potential legal battles create uncertainty for its millions of American fans.

As the situation takes place, all eyes will be on Bytedance, the Biden administration and the Trump administration coming to see how they sail on this conflict with a high post office. The result could be a precedent for the way in which the United States government faces technological companies of foreign property in the years to come.